transparency

Economic Development Corporation Report, 2022 to 2023 Executive Summary

The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts administers the economic development sales tax program and offers various economic development tools and resources to assist businesses, local government entities and economic development professionals in expanding the Texas economy.

The Comptroller’s Data Analysis and Transparency Division supports local governments’ economic development efforts in Texas. The division offers technical assistance, informative publications, webinars and workshops on tax-related state and local economic development programs the Comptroller’s office administers. Division staff members collaborate with other state agencies to offer economic development professionals accredited training, including the Basic Economic Development Course and the statutorily required Economic Development Sales Tax Seminar.

The Comptroller’s office offers an online resource, Comptroller.Texas.Gov, which provides a wealth of information on state and local finances and numerous other tools and data sources to support economic growth in communities throughout Texas. Comptroller.Texas.Gov is a one-stop center providing key statistics affecting the Texas economy, including economic news, forecasts and more.

Due to the agency’s role as administrator of the economic development sales tax programs, the Legislature has charged the Comptroller’s office with compiling this informative report on economic development corporations (EDCs) each biennium.

History of Type A and Type B Economic Development Corporations

Since the adoption of the Development Corporation Act in 1979, Texas law has allowed cities to form EDCs to attract businesses and create job opportunities. The Legislature amended the act in 1989 and again in 1991 to allow eligible cities to adopt dedicated sales and use taxes to fund EDCs. In 2009, the act was recodified to Local Government Code Chapters 501 through 505. With the recodification, EDCs formerly known as 4A and 4B corporations are now referred to as Type A and Type B corporations, respectively.

The Difference Between Type A and Type B

The Type A corporation is limited to funding industrial and manufacturing facilities, research and development facilities, recycling facilities, distribution centers, small warehouse facilities, military facilities, job training, targeted infrastructure, regional or national headquarters facilities, business airport facilities and port-related facilities. Expenditures for such infrastructure must be related to an authorized activity under the act.

The statute allows a Type A EDC to undertake most Type B projects without having to change from a Type A to a Type B corporation. To make such a change, the city council must publish notice, hold a public hearing and obtain voter approval. Voter approval isn’t required if the Type A corporation is located in a city that also operates a Type B corporation and has a population of 7,500 or less.

At the end of fiscal 2023, 197 cities had Type A economic development corporations.

A Type B corporation offers greater flexibility in revenue use. Generally, Type B expenditures include those available under Type A as well as projects that contribute to the quality of life in the community, such as park-related facilities, professional and amateur sports and athletic facilities, tourism and entertainment facilities, affordable housing or other improvements promoting new or expanded business enterprises while creating or retaining primary jobs. At the end of fiscal 2023, 521 cities operated Type B EDCs.

Cities must seek voter approval to levy a Type A, Type B or both economic development sales taxes. State law requires a city that adopts either or both to establish a corporation to administer and oversee the expenditure of the sales tax proceeds. A board of directors appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the city’s governing body oversees the EDC. The city must deliver economic development sales tax revenues to the EDC upon receipt of the funds from the Comptroller’s office. The EDC board of directors is responsible for all decisions regarding the use of these revenues and projects undertaken. The city council retains final oversight authority, though, and must approve the EDC’s programs and expenditures.

Reporting Requirement

In 1997, the Texas Legislature added a provision to the Development Corporation Act requiring EDCs to report their financial activities to the Comptroller’s office. In each even-numbered year since 1998, the Comptroller’s office has prepared a report for the Legislature summarizing the data submitted by EDCs during the preceding biennium. The statute requires all Type A and B corporations to file an annual report with the Comptroller’s office by April 1 of each year, with data from the previous fiscal year.

In December of each year, the Comptroller’s office emails a notice to all known Type A and B corporations, including those in cities that held successful elections for the adoption of one or both sales taxes in the prior year. The notice contains an electronic access code and instructions for filing the report.

The Act restricts the report length to a single page. To improve reporting efficiency and accuracy, each corporation may file electronically only via a secure website with a unique log-in code that changes annually. The form and reporting history for each corporation may be viewed on the Comptroller’s website.

In 2020, the Comptroller’s office introduced the EDC Report Data Dashboard. This visualization tool gives users the option to view individual corporation data or to create comparison reports for any group of EDCs for any fiscal year from 1997 to present. Data may be viewed, printed, or downloaded in tabular and graphic format. The tool also has a directory of EDCs with contact information to facilitate better communication between EDCs, business prospects and the public.

The Type A and Type B Sales Tax Data and Analysis

There were 721 EDCs operating in the state in fiscal 2022. The total number of EDCs declined to 718 in fiscal 2023.

State law allows cities to have EDCs not funded by sales tax. The city of Anna has a Type A corporation, and the city of Fort Worth has a Type B corporation. These corporations receive funding from grants, user fees and other miscellaneous revenue.

In all, total reported corporation revenue rose by 27.4 percent from the prior biennium, to more than $3.2 billion. In the same period, expenditures rose by 6.2 percent, to nearly $2.3 billion. This report provides a statewide analysis of EDC revenue, expenditures, capital assets, economic development objectives and year-end fund balances for fiscal 2022 and 2023. The full dataset is available online at the EDC Report Data Dashboard.

Sources of Funds

In fiscal 2022 and 2023, sales tax was the major source of revenue for both types of EDCs. These receipts totaled nearly $1.2 billion in fiscal 2022 and accounted for 72 percent of all corporation revenues. Sales tax receipts totaled more than $1.2 billion in fiscal 2023, and the sales tax’s share of total revenues rose to 77.4 percent. Sales tax proceeds increased a combined $58.4 million or 4.9 percent from fiscal 2022 to fiscal 2023. Average sales tax receipts per corporation increased from $1.6 million to $1.7 million. The median sales tax receipts during the two fiscal years were only $313,746 and $332,241, respectively, as the 40 EDCs with the highest sales tax revenue represent nearly half of the combined sales tax revenue of all EDCs (Exhibits 1 and 2 and EDC Report Data Dashboard).

Exhibit 1: Source of Funds, Type A and Type B Economic Development Corporations, Fiscal 2022 and 2023
RevenueAll Corporations Type A Corporations Type B Corporations
202220232022202320222023
Sales Tax $1,183,050,886 $1,241,479,054 $409,326,820 $438,393,977 $773,724,066 $803,085,077
State/Federal Grants and Matching Contributions $20,384,657 $14,267,695 $3,030,946 $3,087,350 $17,353,711 $11,180,345
Rental/Lease/ User Fees Income $33,188,362 $34,380,932 $13,753,176 $16,429,206 $19,435,186 $17,951,726
Bond Proceeds/Loans Obtained $223,459,954 $102,595,300 $53,356,067 $65,692,014 $170,103,887 $36,903,286
Other Revenue $183,758,661 $210,777,647 $68,517,594 $64,263,676 $115,241,067 $146,513,971
Total $1,643,842,520 $1,603,500,628 $547,984,603 $587,866,223 $1,095,857,917 $1,015,634,405
Number of Corporations 721 718 200 197 521 521
Median Sales Tax Revenue Per EDC $313,746 $332,241 $480,834 $517,141 $283,410 $295,282
Average Sales Tax Revenue Per EDC $1,640,847 $1,729,079 $2,046,634 $2,225,350 $1,485,075 $1,541,430

Exhibit 2: Source of Funds as a Percentage of Total Revenue, Type A and Type B Economic Development Corporations, Fiscal 2022 and 2023
RevenueAll Corporations Type A Corporations Type B Corporations
202220232022202320222023
Sales Tax 72.0% 77.4% 74.7% 74.6% 70.6% 79.1%
State/Federal Grants and Matching Contributions 1.2% 0.9% 0.6% 0.5% 1.6% 1.1%
Rental/Lease/ User Fees Income 2.0% 2.1% 2.5% 2.8% 1.8% 1.8%
Bond Proceeds/Loans Obtained 13.6% 6.4% 9.7% 11.2% 15.5% 3.6%
Other Revenue 11.2% 13.1% 12.5% 10.9% 10.5% 14.4%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

The second largest revenue source for all corporations in fiscal 2022 was bonds/loans. Combined, this category accounted for $223.5 million or 13.6 percent of revenue for Type A and B corporations in fiscal 2022. In fiscal 2023, the second largest revenue source for all corporations was “other” revenue at $210.7 million, or 13.1 percent.

The third largest revenue source for all corporations in fiscal 2022 was other. Combined, this category accounted for $183.8 million or 11.2 percent of revenue for Type A and B corporations in fiscal 2022. In fiscal 2023, the third largest revenue source for all corporations was bonds/loans at $102.6 million, or 6.4 percent (Exhibits 1 and 2).

Expenditures

The 721 Type A and B corporations reported expenditures of nearly $1.1 billion in fiscal 2022. Expenditures by the 718 corporations reporting in fiscal 2023 increased by 12 percent to more than $1.2 billion (Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 3: Uses of Funds, Type A and Type B Economic Development Corporations, Fiscal 2022 and 2023
ExpendituresAll Corporations Type A Corporations Type B Corporations
202220232022202320222023
Personnel $84,072,500 $92,508,843 $31,571,578 $35,008,424 $52,500,922 $57,500,419
Administration $94,262,555 $96,693,425 $28,693,381 $30,157,763 $65,569,174 $66,535,662
Marketing and Promotion $31,408,204 $36,965,441 $14,792,887 $17,884,898 $16,615,317 $19,080,543
Direct Business Incentives $187,546,324 $200,699,361 $93,165,153 $133,692,509 $94,381,171 $67,006,852
Job Training $3,746,362 $4,961,633 $1,293,176 $1,840,164 $2,453,186 $3,121,469
Debt Service $229,756,793 $183,754,018 $89,816,386 $70,139,671 $139,940,407 $113,614,347
Capital Costs $282,812,180 $413,477,065 $58,437,832 $92,671,462 $224,374,348 $320,805,603
Affordable Housing $3,003,213 $1,971,724 $652,190 $521,829 $2,351,023 $1,449,895
Payments to Taxing Units $42,725,362 $39,791,257 $7,998,292 $6,287,559 $34,727,070 $33,503,698
Other $118,664,721 $136,669,319 $26,859,107 $32,992,251 $91,805,614 $103,677,068
Total $1,077,998,214 $1,207,492,086 $353,279,982 $421,196,530 $724,718,232 $786,295,556

All corporations combined reported increases in personnel, administration, marketing and promotion, direct business incentives, job training, capital costs and other. However, for debt service, affordable housing, and payments to taxing units, all corporations combined spent less from fiscal 2022 to fiscal 2023 (Exhibit 3).

Type A and Type B corporations reported similar patterns in increases and decreases from fiscal 2022 to fiscal 2023. They saw an increase in spending for every category except debt services, affordable housing and payments to taxing units. Meanwhile, direct business incentives saw an increase in the Type A expenditures for fiscal 2022 to fiscal 2023, while the Type B decreased during the same period (Exhibit 3).

It’s often useful to examine expenditure categories as a percentage of total expenditures to see how categories are changing in relation to one another. For example, Type B corporations spent a much larger percentage of their total expenditures on capital costs than Type A corporations (Exhibit 4). In fiscal 2023, Type A corporations spent 22 percent on capital costs, while Type B corporations spent 40.8 percent. On the other hand, from fiscal 2022 to fiscal 2023 Type A corporations saw an increase in direct business expenses from 26.4 percent to 31.7 percent of expenditures compared to Type B, which saw a decrease from 13 percent to 8.5 percent in this category (Exhibit 4).

Exhibit 4: Uses of Funds as a Percentage of Total Spending, Type A and Type B Economic Development Corporations, Fiscal 2022 and 2023
ExpendituresAll Corporations Type A Corporations Type B Corporations
202220232022202320222023
Personnel 7.8% 7.7% 8.9% 8.3% 7.2% 7.3%
Administration 8.7% 8.0% 8.1% 7.2% 9.0% 8.5%
Marketing and Promotion 2.9% 3.1% 4.2% 4.2% 2.3% 2.4%
Direct Business Incentives 17.4% 16.6% 26.4% 31.7% 13.0% 8.5%
Job Training 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4%
Debt Service 21.3% 15.2% 25.4% 16.7% 19.3% 14.4%
Capital Costs 26.2% 34.2% 16.5% 22.0% 31.0% 40.8%
Affordable Housing 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2%
Payments to Taxing Units 4.0% 3.3% 2.3% 1.5% 4.8% 4.3%
Other 11.0% 11.3% 7.6% 7.8% 12.7% 13.2%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

State law caps marketing and promotional expenditures by both Type A and Type B corporations at 10 percent of annual revenues, except under certain circumstances. The limit is 25 percent of revenues for a Type A city that:

  • has municipal limits including two counties;
  • has less than 24,250 residents, according to the 1990 federal census; and
  • is located within 10 miles of a federal military reservation.

Reports for fiscal 2022 indicate that 7 of the 200 Type A corporations spent more than 10 percent of their revenues for marketing and promotion. Five Type A EDCs exceeded 20 percent. Of the 521 Type B corporations reporting in fiscal 2022, 37 exceeded the 10 percent threshold and 19 exceeded 20 percent of revenues (EDC Report Data Dashboard).

In fiscal 2023, 11 of the 197 Type A corporations reported marketing and promotion expenses above the 10 percent cap, with 5 exceeding 20 percent. For the 521 Type B corporations reporting that year, 47 exceeded the 10 percent limit and 22 exceeded 20 percent.

The average expenditure for marketing and promotion for Type A corporations was 4.4 percent of total revenues for fiscal 2022 and 5.3 percent in fiscal 2023. For Type B corporations, the average was 6.2 percent of total revenues in fiscal 2022 and 6.2 percent in fiscal 2023.

While most Type A and Type B corporations appear to be complying with the limitation on marketing and promotional expenses, the act does not require a corporation to prove it qualifies for an exception to the statute or provide any penalty for those that exceed the limit. Also note, some corporations exceeding the statutory limit may have carried forward unused revenues budgeted for marketing and promotion from previous fiscal years. Attorney General Opinion GA-0086 states:

… a corporation that chooses to spend revenues for promotional purposes may spend up to 10 percent of its annual revenues for that purpose or may set all or some of these funds aside in a promotional purposes account. A corporation that set aside revenues in such an account could spend those past year revenues along with the allowable percentage of its current annual revenues for promotional purposes without violating the cap.

Primary Economic Development Objectives

In fiscal 2022 and 2023, most EDCs listed more than one primary economic development objective, with only slight variations in selections between fiscal years. Job creation/retention was the most commonly preferred objective for Type A EDCs followed by infrastructure projects. For Type B corporations, the top two choices were the same as those of Type A corporations, but the order was reversed. Sports facilities/recreation and tourism were popular third and fourth choices for Type B corporations, while relatively few Type A EDCs selected these categories (Exhibit 5).

Exhibit 5: Fiscal 2022 and 2023 Economic Development Objectives
Total Fiscal 2022 Total Fiscal 2023 Type A
Fiscal 2022
Type B
Fiscal 2022
Type A
Fiscal 2023
Type B
Fiscal 2023
Job Creation/Job Retention 544 542 179 365 176 366
Tourism 285 292 46 239 44 248
Sports Facilities/Recreation 280 284 34 246 33 251
Infrastructure Projects 576 583 162 414 161 422
Other 157 168 28 129 31 137

Types of Capital Assets

In fiscal 2023, 570 of 718 corporations reported capital assets. The most common capital asset was land, including both acreage and lots, reported by (384) EDCs. Other capital assets included buildings (188), equipment (157), industrial parks/sites (142), other (134), commercial buildings (140), and recreational facilities (121). The number of reported assets exceeded the total number of corporations because many corporations reported owning more than one asset type.

There was a slight difference between the share of Type A and Type B corporations reporting capital assets. In fiscal 2023, 167 or 84.8 percent of the 197 Type A corporations reporting owned capital assets, compared to 403 or 77.4 percent of the 521 Type B corporations. This disparity could be the result of some Type B corporations spending funds on assets transferred to the city upon completion, such as park-related projects.

Exhibits 6a and 6b compare assets owned by the two types of corporations in fiscal 2023. The largest disparity is found in two categories pertaining to the ownership of recreation facilities and industrial park sites. Ownership of industrial parks/sites was much more common among Type A corporations (18 percent) compared to Type B corporations (8 percent). Ownership of recreational facilities was more common among Type B corporations (13 percent) compared to Type A (3 percent). Type A corporations had a greater share in the categories of land and commercial buildings. Type B corporations more commonly owned equipment and “other.”

Exhibit 6a: Capital Assets, Type A Corporations, Fiscal 2023
Asset Number Percent of total
Building 57 14%
Commercial Building 58 14%
Equipment 42 10%
Industrial Park Site 75 18%
Land 131 32%
Recreation Facility 11 3%
Other 35 9%
Total 409
Exhibit 6b: Capital Assets, Type B Corporations, Fiscal 2023
Asset Number Percent of total
Building 131 15%
Commercial Building 82 10%
Equipment 115 13%
Industrial Park Site 67 8%
Land 253 29%
Recreation Facility 110 13%
Other 99 12%

Corporation Fund Balances

Beginning in fiscal 2006, the Comptroller’s office asked each corporation to report its year-end unrestricted fund balance or unrestricted retained earnings (EDC Report Data Dashboard). These are funds that have not been formally designated by the board of directors for a project cost or other expenditure during the fiscal year. Fund balances may carry over from year to year and may be positive, negative or zero, depending on the accounting method used by the EDC.

In fiscal 2022, the 171 Type A corporations reporting had combined fund balances of $703.8 million. This total increased to $868.4 million for the 173 Type A corporations reporting fund balances in fiscal 2023.

The 447 Type B corporations reporting in fiscal 2022 had total fund balances of nearly $1.3 billion. For fiscal 2023, 442 reporting Type B corporations recorded year-end fund balances totaling more than $1.3 billion.

In all, Type A and Type B corporations reported fund balances of nearly $2.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2023.

Trends Impacting the Economic Development Sales Tax

Between fiscal 1997 and 2023, there was a net increase in EDCs of 382, for an average increase of 14.7 per year. However, as many Texas cities reach the 2 percent local sales tax rate cap, growth in the number of new EDCs stalled (Exhibit 7). The total number of EDCs peaked at 730 in fiscal 2016 and declined to 718 by fiscal 2023.

Exhibit 7: Number of Economic Development Corporations, 1999 to 2023
Year Type A Corporation Type B Corporation Total
1999 174 272 446
2000 189 301 490
2001 199 325 524
2002 203 352 555
2003 208 380 588
2004 209 397 606
2005 211 413 624
2006 215 419 634
2007 217 435 652
2008 219 447 666
2009 219 461 680
2010 219 470 689
2011 216 481 697
2012 215 488 703
2013 216 492 708
2014 214 500 714
2015 218 505 723
2016 219 511 730
2017 218 510 728
2018 215 512 727
2019 211 515 727
2020 207 519 726
2021 204 521 725
2022 200 521 721
2023 197 521 718

One factor affecting the rate of decrease is competition from other types of sales tax. Sales tax ballot initiatives may take place up to twice per year if initiated by a city council or upon a successful petition by a community’s registered voters. The result may make it impossible to impose any further local sales taxes or may lead to the abolition of existing ones.

For example, the city of Comanche abolished its Type A and adopted a Type B sales tax in fiscal 2023. During fiscal 2023 the city of Bartonville reduced the sales tax rate for its Type B EDC and the city of Copperas Cove reduced the sales tax rate for its Type A EDC to increase its sales tax rate for street maintenance and repair.

By the end of fiscal 2023, 359 Texas cities had adopted the sales tax for property tax relief, 232 cities had adopted the sales tax for street maintenance and repair, 10 imposed sales tax to fund construction of sports or community venues, and 35 cities had adopted the sales tax for municipal development.

Corporation Fiscal Year

Most corporations adopted a fiscal year that corresponds to their sponsoring city. Of the 718 corporations reporting in fiscal 2023, 657 or 91.5 percent listed Oct. 1 through Sept. 30 as their fiscal year. Nineteen corporations, or 2.6 percent, used the calendar year as their fiscal year. Seventeen, or 2.4 percent, began their fiscal year on July 1. Fifteen corporations, or 2.1 percent, began their fiscal year on April 1. Ten corporations adopted other fiscal years, accounting for the remaining 1.4 percent.

For more information about the authority and responsibilities of Type A and Type B corporations, refer to Comptroller publication #96-302, Economic Development Sales Tax, or contact the Comptroller’s Data Analysis and Transparency Division at 844-519-5672.